This safety warning was based on its receipt of over 900 adverse event reports identifying serious problems with IVC filters. The FDA issued a safety communication raising concerns about IVC Filters in 2010.
They are designed to capture blood clots and thereby prevent pulmonary embolisms (blood clots in the lungs). These small cage-like devices are implanted in the inferior vena cava (IVC), the main vessel returning blood from the lower body to the heart. These filters cause serious injuries by tilting, or by fracturing and migrating to the heart and lungs.ĭoctors implant these blood clot filters in patients who face the risk of developing blood clots, but cannot take blood thinner medications. Bard, Cook Medical, and Cordis may cause serious side effects, including death.
CLASS ACTIO SUIT ON HEART BLOOD CLOT FILTERS FREE
Contact My Vaccine Lawyer now to receive a free case evaluation.Have You Been Affected by Defective IVC FIlters?ĭefective IVC blood clot filters manufactured by C. However, our attorneys are committed to investigating and pursuing claims against all manufacturers of defective IVC filter products. Litigation likes this takes many years to resolve, with teams of lawyers spending millions of dollars trying to determine exactly what occurred, and how it could have been prevented. Bard, went as far as to forge an employee’s signature to gain FDA approval for the device after the FDA denied them clearance in 2002.Īs of this time, there have been no large group settlements involving the IVC filters. Furthermore, attorneys argue that these manufacturers knew of these potential design flaws, hid the results of their own research and failed to warn those using their devices. These lawsuits are being filed claiming that the manufacturers of the medical devices were negligent in their design, with physicians and patients reporting high failure rates which are resulting in internal bleeding, organ damage and chronic pain. The multi-district litigation is pending in the U.S. Today there are over 100 complaints filed against Cook Medical, and more than 50 filed against C.R. In 2012, the first IVC filter lawsuit was filed against manufacturer C.R. Migration of the device resulting in perforation or punctureĭepuy attune knee replacement lawsuit information.Device fracture (pieces of the device travel through the veins, causing internal injuries).The prolonged presence of certain retrievable IVC Filters is linked to serious, even fatal complications, including: The metal device, or pieces from it, can then move through the blood, working their way through a vein wall and puncturing an internal organ. There have been reports of the IVC blood clot filter falling out of place or breaking apart. IVC Filters are supposed to protect patients from dangerous blood clots entering the heart, lungs, kidneys or brain, but the devices themselves are potentially deadly. IVC filter complications and side effects As such, they are built with a mechanism to permit ready removal. Permanent IVC filters are designed for people with chronic risk of pulmonary embolism (PE), and retrievable IVC filters are designed for those whom physicians deem to have a temporary risk of PE. There are two types of IVC Filters: permanent and retrievable. They are typically prescribed for patients who cannot tolerate blood-thinning medications or for patients who continue to develop clots despite the use of blood-thinning medications. It is designed to capture an embolism (a blood clot that has broken loose from a deep vein in the legs on its way to the heart and lungs) and allow it to break down over time before it reaches any major organs. An IVC filter is a small, spider-like, cone-shaped wire device that is implanted in the inferior vena cava (a large vein that carries deoxygenated blood from the lower body into the heart) just below the kidneys. IVC Filters (inferior vena cava filter), are commonly used in patients at risk for, or with a history of, venous thromboembolism (EVT), which is the formation of a blood clot in the vein. Bard (the manufacturer) hid the results of its own research which had found the filter dangerous, and even forged an employee’s signature on an FDA application in order to get approval. Our law firm is accepting clients who suffered injuries as a result of an IVC filter. The claims involving the IVC Filter state the manufacturers of the device failed to warn patients and physicians of the increased risks of the filter breaking, and metal fragments moving through the blood, potentially damaging an organ. IVC filter lawsuits claim that these devices cause a high failure rate leading to bleeding, organ damage and chronic pain. IVC blood clot filter class action lawsuit
0 kommentar(er)
